Supreme Court Positions Aren’t Filled by Dying Wishes

Daniel Greenfield, The United States is run based on the text of the Constitution, of the general body of law, and, even more unfortunately, assorted legal precedents.

It is not run based on dying wishes.

What Justice Ginsburg’s dying wish was and whether it’s authentic or not has zero relevance to anything involving her seat. A dying senator would not be entitled to have his seat remain vacant. Ditto for a dying president.

There’s no reason for a dying justice from the third branch of government to be able to do so.

Dying wishes are to be respected only insofar as they don’t interfere with the legal rights and obligations of the country. The people of the country have a right to be represented in the legislature and in the executive branch, and in the judiciary. Cases that go before the Supreme Court should be heard by a full court.

That’s how the system functions.

Now a sensible alternative to this mess (if there was a market for sensible alternatives, which there isn’t) would be formalizing and codifying rules for replacing deceased justices in law, rather than usage and custom, which is what it is now, and possibly having alternates in place. All of that is a non-issue because this is a brute force power struggle. And if President Trump succeeds in filling a court seat, and Biden wins and Democrats take the Senate, court packing is on the agenda.

And the dying wish becomes another political banner to wave.

Everyone knows that if Justice Scalia’s family had communicated a dying wish not to have his seat filled by Obama, it would have been dismissed by Democrats and their media out of hand. And they would have been right to do so. There might be good reasons to fill or not to fill a seat, but a dying wish isn’t one of them.

If Republicans Don’t Fill the RBG Seat, Democrats Will Win an Election On It

Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s death added fuel to the Biden-Harris and Democrat campaigns. Money has been pouring in from furious TDSers in New York and California who reached a new plateau of rage and hate. But the issue also supplies the Harris-Biden campaign with an abortion plank to run on.

Only appointing a new justice to fill the seat can take that away.

If Republicans fail to fit that seat, the Democrats will make the election about the stakes of taking that seat, especially at the Senate level. If Republicans do fill the seat, then Democrats will run on revenge and rage (not to mention court packing), but they’re running on two out of those three anyway.

Being able to run on an actual seat at stake is simply more powerful and will mobilize the feminist wing of the Democrats far more effectively.

Related Posts:
Trump Campaign Takes Wisconsin Fight to US Supreme Court
Speaking About News

On Tuesday, the Trump campaign took their election fight in Wisconsin to the US Supreme Court where they will be Read more

Govs Blocking Legislature Rights To Select Electors Face Federal Lawsuit
Speaking About News

Daniel John Sobieski,  When the Supreme Court of Chief Justice John Roberts rejected the lawsuit of the state of Texas Read more

Trump campaign takes fight over Penn. election, ballot laws to Supreme Court
Speaking About News

President Trump There Was Massive Voter Fraud. President Trump’s campaign team on Sunday filed an appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court asking it Read more

Update Surrounding Sidney Powell Case
Speaking About News

According to new revelations, Trump ally and attorney Sidney Powell's case against the state of Michigan has officially made it Read more

Send this to a friend