Axios says the Russian hack campaign targeting U.S. government agencies and international companies is an act of war.
The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency earlier this week confirmed a sophisticated cyberattack on the U.S. government with the use of network management software made by SolarWinds, a Texas-headquartered IT firm.
One U.S. official labeled it the “worst hacking case in the history of America.”
“They got into everything,” the official told Fox News.
Microsoft on Friday said the hacking is “a moment of reckoning.”
“As much as anything, this attack provides a moment of reckoning,” Microsoft President Brad Smith wrote. “It requires that we look with clear eyes at the growing threats we face and commit to more effective and collaborative leadership by the government and the tech sector in the United States to spearhead a strong and coordinated global cybersecurity response.”
Microsoft said more than 40 client organizations, 80% of which are U.S.-based, were compromised.
“If this had been a physical attack on America’s secrets, we could be at war,” Mike Allen of Axios wrote Friday.
“Imagine if during the Cold War, the Soviet Union had broken into a building in Washington and walked out with correspondence, budgets and more.”
Sen. Chris Coons, D-Ala., made the same suggestion.
“It’s pretty hard to distinguish this from an act of aggression that rises to the level of an attack that qualifies as war,” Coons said during an appearance on MSNBC. … “[T]his is as destructive and broad scale an engagement with our military systems, our intelligence systems as has happened in my lifetime.”
Russia’s hack of US government: Here’s what you need to know
A U.S. official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said the hack was severe and extremely damaging, though no agency has been publicly blamed yet. While the full extent of the attack is unknown, the official labeled it “the worst hacking case in the history of America.”
“They got into everything,” the official added.
Timeline of events
The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) on Sunday issued its fifth-ever emergency directive, which mandated government users disconnect from SolarWinds.
SolarWinds services some 300,000 clients, including government agencies and almost all Fortune 500 companies.
Reuters first reported on the attack on Sunday, calling the hackers “highly sophisticated.” The report claimed that the National Security Council convened at the White House on Dec. 12 ahead of issuing the emergency directive.
On Sunday, SolarWinds first notified some 33,000 of its customers that an “outside nation state” had found a back door into some updated versions of Orion.
SolarWinds admitted that there was a “potential vulnerability” related to its updates between March and June for software products called Orion.
“In a nutshell, SolarWinds’ Orion product provides centralized monitoring across an organization’s entire IT stack. That means the attackers who were able to compromise this platform had an extremely high level of access to all of these client systems,” David Kennedy, CEO of TrustedSec, told Fox News.
Later on Sunday, Dec. 13, the White House confirmed the reports, saying that the government was “taking all necessary steps to identify and remedy any possible issues related to this situation.”
The attack is also suspected to be connected to a breach at U.S. cybersecurity firm FireEye, which said that its investigation into the hack identified a “global campaign” that targeted governments and businesses by inserting malware into SolarWinds updates beginning last spring.
White House Deputy Press Secretary Brian Morgenstern said Friday that President Trump has made it clear that the federal government is working with interagency groups and response teams; the FBI, DHS, ODNI and NSA.
“Ambassador Robert O’Brien is convening meetings more than once a day to work with agencies to mitigate effects,” Morgenstern added. “We will not forecast any response to adversaries.”
Who was involved?
FireEye said it confirmed intrusions in North America, Europe, Asia and the Middle East.
The Washington Post then reported that the FBI is investigating whether a group connected to the Russian Foreign Intelligence Service, SVR, is behind the attacks. Suspected hackers are known by the nicknames APT29 or Cozy Bear.
However, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov denied Russia was involved.
“Once again, I can reject these accusations,” Peskov told reporters. “If for many months the Americans couldn’t do anything about it, then, probably, one shouldn’t unfoundedly blame the Russians for everything.”
What agencies were affected?
As it stands now, the U.S. State Department, Department of Homeland Security (DHS), and elements of the Department of Defense have reported being compromised. The hack may have lasted for months, targeting Treasury and Commerce departments.
Government agencies, such as the Department of Energy, moved quickly to protect themselves and investigate the incidents.
“At this point, the investigation has found that the malware has been isolated to business networks only, and has not impacted the mission-essential national security functions of the Department, including the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA),” DOE Spokeswoman Shaylyn Hynes told Fox News.
“When DOE identified vulnerable software, immediate action was taken to mitigate the risk, and all software identified as being vulnerable to this attack was disconnected from the DOE network.”
Tech giant Microsoft revealed on Thursday that it had identified more than 40 government agencies, think tanks, non-governmental organizations and IT companies infiltrated by the hackers – four in five of which were in the United States, nearly half of them tech companies.
“This is not ‘espionage as usual,’ even in the digital age. Instead, it represents an act of recklessness that created a serious technological vulnerability for the United States and the world,” Microsoft Said.
“While the most recent attack appears to reflect a particular focus on the United States and many other democracies, it also provides a powerful reminder that people in virtually every country are at risk and need protection irrespective of the governments they live under.”