Google sends ‘24 hour warning’ to free-speech ‘anti-Facebook’ platform, Minds

The social media platform Minds had to remove ‘major functionality’ from its Android app after getting a chilling warning from Google. Its co-founder said plans for a censorship-resistant infrastructure are in the works.

In a post on Friday evening, Bill Ottman said that Minds had received a “24 hour warning” from the Google Play store. This forced them to submit an updated version of the app, based on “interim solution and ninja developers,” which removed the search, discovery and comments functionality.

“I know. We aren’t happy and will be working towards something better,” Ottman said. “What is happening on the internet with major providers is fueling the cultural divide as much as anything,” he added.

Operating since 2015, Minds was conceived as a blockchain-based community-owned social media platform that would not monetize user data but enable free speech instead. Wired magazine once described it as the “anti-Facebook.”

Owen is joined by James O’Keefe of Project Veritas, after the explosive video released of Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey who revealed his true intentions on social media.

Ottman advised users to download the app from Minds directly if possible. “If you are on Apple, leave if you’re smart,” he said.

As for going forward, he said a plan for “fully censorship-resistant infrastructure” is coming soon, and that Minds has “multiple escape pods ready to go” if Amazon moves against them.

Ottman’s comments were a clear reference to what happened to Parler. The free-speech social media platform attracted tens of thousands of users purged from Twitter in the wake of the January 6 unrest at the US Capitol – only to be banned from Google and Apple stores, and then taken down from the internet entirely after Amazon Web Services (AWS) denied them access to the cloud. Parler’s executives later revealed that other vendors rushed to jump ship as well, leaving them unable to operate entirely.

Those who complained about the rising tide of censorship have typically been told that the First Amendment to the US Constitution did not apply to private companies and that people should “build their own” platforms if they disagreed. Parler’s shutdown has shown that this is near-impossible when the major players control the internet infrastructure itself, however.

Mainstream media and tech platforms have gone after Parler, Gab, Minds, and Telegram for allegedly having “far-right”users and allowing “hate speech” as content. In Parler’s case, Amazon’s ultimatum demanded moderation policies they would approve of in order to avoid removal from AWS.

In a lawsuit accusing Amazon of breach of contract, antitrust violations and defamation, Parler argued that this was pretextual and revealed that Amazon staff sought to find out if US President Donald Trump – freshly banned from Twitter and locked out of Facebook – had set up an account on the platform.

Related Posts:
Southern Poverty Law Center Pushes Section 230 Repeal to Censor Conservatives
Speaking About News

Daniel Greenfield, I've been writing about the digital iron curtain for a while now and the conservative movement has gone from Read more

Parler CEO John Matze says he’s been terminated by board
Speaking About News

"The future of Parler is no longer in my hands," Matze wrote. Parler has terminated CEO John Matze, according to Read more

Parler is Busy trying to get back online
Speaking About News

Parler tried to seek a hosting alternative to Amazon Web Services from at least six different potential providers once it Read more

Trump Responds to Twitter’s Permanent Account Suspension
Speaking About News

President Donald Trump responded to Twitter’s move to permanently suspend his account from its platform late Friday, condemning the big Read more

Send this to a friend