Dr. Chris Martenson holds a PhD in toxicology from Duke University and is a futurist and economic researcher. Martenson says the FDA just approved a Pfizer CV19 vaccine named Comirnaty, but the public is not getting it.
This is classic bait and switch because the public is still getting the same Pfizer jab they have been getting all along. It’s still experimental (Emergency Use Authorization or EUA), and it still gives Pfizer total immunity from liability.
Dr. Martenson explains, “For all practical purposes, there are two identical drugs. One stays under EUA, and one has been given approval. The problem is the one given approval, and if you are in the United States, you can’t get it. There is none here. So, they approved something that doesn’t exist. This feels like legal wrangling.
People say, oh, they have approved this vaccine, and they have our best interest at heart. I say if that were true, they would have released a lot more data. We did not get any new data on the filing, and they would not have given us this legal Rube Goldberg runaround, and we would not still be seeing people being injected with something still under a EUA, which absolves the manufacturer of liability. That’s the situation we are in right now. If the FDA was looking to build trust with people who were a little hesitant, I think they completely dropped the ball on that and committed a huge error.”
Dr. Martenson says he looked at the Comirnaty data and contends, “So much of this has been unfortunately conducted. We would like to see a lot more data coming out around this. In the FDA release about this approval letter that they just put forward, we can see a lot of things in there that are actually fraudulent in my opinion.
They mention in there a 91.3% effectiveness rate, which was the original rate of effectiveness of data that was gathered way back on March 31, 2021. The CDC, all on its own, just 5 days before the August 23 approval of this Pfizer Comirnaty thing, the CDC said the most recent data they had said there is a 79.8% effectiveness, but the FDA is sticking with 91.3%.
This is a huge disagreement between the CDC and the FDA. All I can imagine is inside the FDA, they couldn’t flat out bring themselves to approve this. I am sure there are all sorts of legal ramifications and bureaucratic ramifications and on and on and on.
Again, if the intent was to make people feel less hesitant and less resistant, they needed to be completely open and completely transparent, and they didn’t. They actually used data that is old, that everybody knows is completely out of date and no longer true. . . .There is so much data that is not there. I am not sure if they just ‘lost it’ or it has not been submitted or it’s being hidden. I don’t know what the story really is, but I can tell you there is a lot of data missing.”
Martenson also talks about the Federal Reserve and how the central bankers have set the country up for a huge economic fall in the not-so-distant future. Martenson contends this fall will destroy businesses, families and cost a lot of lives. There is much more in the 40 min. interview.